Is Creationism being used as a political pawn?


While it appears that both Creationism and Intelligent Design have some reason behind their different stances, from where I see it, it seems like Creationism is being used as a political pawn, which is unfortunate.

I don't think that all proponents of Creationism are involved in this, but at least in my field of vision in today's world, I'm seeing it be used as a political pawn. I feel that is a danger area, where getting involved in all that might make us like Sadducees or Pharisees, who put political agendas ahead of God's word. The Creationism in and of itself is not the issue: if anything, the proponents are going very literally by God's word, for which they can hardly be faulted.

No, the problem lies where atheists claim that evolution is proof that the Bible is untrue. (That itself is a flawed argument - read my other post about why).

Instead of calling out atheists and pointing out that evolution does not tell us one way or another about whether there is a Creator (it's an equally good argument that there is a Creator, actually), Creationists seem to think that evolution is therefore for atheists. They also seem to think that any Christian believing in evolution must only be doing it to "make it all somehow work out and appease the atheists". Nothing could be further from the truth. Christians who do believe in evolution see it much the same as gravity and God's other natural laws. They see it similar to the mountains or the oceans. They admire it as yet another part of God's creation.

Of course, Creationism is a possibility - but so is Intelligent Design.

While they are both possibilities, I feel that Creationism is unfortunately being used by some (but not all) of its proponents as a sort of knee-jerk political reaction to be "as opposite as possible to atheists". I think that this attitude has quite a bit of danger, because our beliefs should not depend in any way (even in an opposite way) to what atheists believe.

If atheists believe that evolutionary theory is a sign that God does not exist, this does not mean they are correct in that conclusion. Likewise, if atheists believe that gravity is a sign that God does not exist, we as Christians should not suddenly stop believing in gravitational theory.

What the atheists do and do not believe should have no bearing on what Christians do or do not believe. Our interpretation should come from the Bible and we should not be swayed by what atheists say, even in an opposite way.

Perhaps some people feel that Creationism is somehow "safer" than Intelligent Design. Yet, there is also danger in blindly disregarding Intelligent Design; if that is the way God worked then being derisive of it is not a good idea.

I have written a previous post explaining that it is virtually impossible for any of us to infallibly say that the Bible teaches creationism or that it teaches evolution; instead, both are possibilities and we should not get hung up on one interpretation versus the other.

If you found this post interesting, you might also like these related posts on this blog:



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Organized religion and why it is important

Why Do Atheists Shout So Loudly When They Believe the Stakes are Lower?

Jesus saves EVERYONE who accepts him. Salvation is available for ALL HUMANS